본문 바로가기 메뉴 바로가기

본문

Management Info

Corporate Governance

ESG Ratings (Source : Korea Corporate Governance Service, KCGS)

2016Rating : B (Governance: B, Social: B, Environment: C) - Source : Korea Corporate Governance Service, KCGS

Corporate Governance Awards received by the Assessee
ESG Corporate Governance Awards received by the Assessee
Year Award Awards Presenters
2014 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2013 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2012 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2011 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2010 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2009 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2008 The best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange
2007 The second best corporate governance company (KOSDAQ) Korea Exchange

Awards Presenters : Korea Exchange

Ratings and their Significance

The ESG (Environmental, Social & Governance) evaluation for KOSDAQ listed companies began in 2011 and its rating system has been changed since 2013.

Ratings and their Significance
S A company has faithfully incorporated best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and its ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value is extremely low.
A+ A company has well incorporated best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and its ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value is very low.
A A company has appropriately incorporated best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and its ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value is low.
B+ A company needs to make a little effort to incorporate best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and it has a little ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value.
B A company needs to make much effort to incorporate best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and it has some ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value.
C A company absolutely needs to make an effort to incorporate best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and it has much ESG risk, which leads to lose shareholder value.
D A company has not incorporated best practices established by Corporate Governance Service to be used as guidelines for socially responsible management in each of ESG areas and there is a realistic concern that it may lose shareholder value led by ESG risk.